AI vs Human · Nu Wav Media

Build Portfolio & Inventory

Every site, app, and engine built across Cloudflare, Vercel, Netlify, and Supabase over the last ~4 months. Internal reference — search, filter by status, and gauge completion at a glance.

Snapshot as of 2026-06-22

Real-World Portfolio Assessment

An honest read — separating what it cost to create (replacement value) from what it's worth today (most builds are pre-revenue) and the upside if the top few get pushed to monetization.

Replacement / Build Cost

$540k – $740k

What an agency or freelance team would charge to recreate all 93 builds from scratch at market rates — now including 16 Claude-native engines/skills (real, reusable IP) and a cluster of live products.

Realistic Value Today

$90k – $180k

Honest current asset value. Still discounted — most builds are pre-revenue — but more is live and monetizable now (27+ deployed) and the engine IP has standalone resale value, so the floor moved up.

12–18 Month Upside

$700k – $1.6M+

If 2–3 products (SONIQ, CLINIQ, GRAVITAS Pro, or a rank-and-rent cohort) reach real revenue, the whole portfolio re-rates on multiples, not build cost.

The real number is concentration, not breadth. 93 builds is a serious body of work, but value follows the 3–4 that get users + revenue. SONIQ (live SaaS), CLINIQ (huge TAM, beachhead locked), GRAVITAS Pro (live 23-agent engine), and the rank-and-rent sites (got-hurt, hookah lounge) have the clearest path to a check.
Live + monetizable today: 27+ builds are deployed — SONIQ, GRAVITAS Pro, protrader, Giflii, Prospect Sweep, NuWav Rotation, plus the client sites (MediCab, KLASSIK, pre-needs, Green Lantern, Doo Good) could invoice now. That's where the first real dollars are.
New this pass — the engine IP is an asset, not just tooling. GRAVITAS, CADENCE, the rank-and-rent engine, and the blindside/blog-graph/schema SEO stack are productized, repeatable revenue engines (each already sells as a client engagement). That's a moat the per-site work doesn't have.
Strongest standalone asset: SONIQ — a live AI-songwriting SaaS with pricing, quotas, and a real frontend. GRAVITAS Pro is the runner-up now that it's live and already powering paid client output.
Biggest unrealized swing: CLINIQ — telehealth + billing is a 7–8 figure category. It's 45% done but the hard architecture call (per-tenant DO, collapsed HIPAA surface) is already made.
The honest discount: "almost complete" is where value goes to die — the IQ cluster (SparqIQ, Gravitiq, Prospect IQ, GrantIQ) is live shells, not finished products. The gap from 60% → paying-users is usually more work than the first 60%. The portfolio's job now is to finish-and-monetize a focused few, not start more.

Methodology: build-cost estimated by category (static/marketing sites $1.5k–$4k, dashboards/tools $5k–$12k, SaaS platforms $15k–$70k each, Claude-native engines/skills $5k–$15k of IP each). "Value today" applies a pre-revenue / completion discount, offset by the larger live + IP surface. Upside is a multiples-based projection contingent on revenue that does not yet exist — a target, not a current valuation. Excludes any Orchids-hosted builds (not yet inventoried). Numbers are directional for internal planning, not an appraisal.

Real-World Portfolio Assessment

Finish prompt

Advisor

＋ Add a build

🛰️ AI Radar — what changed in the AI world that hits your builds

💬 Ask the stack

Update status